EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 9754

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+44.3%
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
43.84

EPYC 9754 outperforms EPYC 7H12 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.09no data
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.6214.82
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)18 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12864 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads256128
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size8x 73 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors71,000 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSP5TR4
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
+44.3%
EPYC 7H12 43.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+44.3%
EPYC 7H12 69633

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 43.84
Recency 13 June 2023 18 September 2019
Physical cores 128 64
Threads 256 128
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 44.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7H12 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 451 vote

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.