C-60 vs EPYC 9754

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
55.98
+31000%

EPYC 9754 outperforms C-60 by a whopping 31000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking303448
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.16no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD C-Series
Power efficiency6.590.85
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date13 June 2023 (2 years ago)22 August 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and C-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1282 (Dual-core)
Threads2562
Base clock speed2.25 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.33 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm40 nm
Die size8x 73 mm275 mm2
Number of transistors71,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and C-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and C-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and C-60 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and C-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon HD 6290

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and C-60.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 9754 55.98
+31000%
C-60 0.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 9754 98752
+31151%
C-60 316

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 9754 1603
+2009%
C-60 76

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 9754 15552
+11170%
C-60 138

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 55.98 0.18
Recency 13 June 2023 22 August 2011
Physical cores 128 2
Threads 256 2
Chip lithography 5 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 9 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 31000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

C-60, on the other hand, has 3900% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD C-60 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9754 is a server/workstation processor while C-60 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
AMD C-60
C-60

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 42 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 254 votes

Rate C-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9754 and C-60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.