Ryzen 9 7950X vs EPYC 9684X

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9684X
2023
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
78.91
+92.6%

EPYC 9684X outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 7950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking465
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency17.9921.98
Architecture codenameGenoa-X (2023)Raphael (Zen 4) (2022)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,756no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 7950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores9616 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads19232
Base clock speed2.55 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1152 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2CCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors135,240 million13140 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 7950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 7950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 7950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 7950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-5200

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 7950X.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9684X 78.91
+92.6%
Ryzen 9 7950X 40.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9684X 120760
+92.6%
Ryzen 9 7950X 62707

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 78.91 40.97
Recency 13 June 2023 27 September 2022
Physical cores 96 16
Threads 192 32
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 170 Watt

EPYC 9684X has a 92.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Ryzen 9 7950X, on the other hand, has 135.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9684X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 7950X in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9684X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 7950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9684X
EPYC 9684X
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 9684X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1592 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9684X or Ryzen 9 7950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.