Ryzen 9 3950X vs EPYC 9684X

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9684X
2023
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
76.02
+212%
Ryzen 9 3950X
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
24.39

EPYC 9684X outperforms Ryzen 9 3950X by a whopping 212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 3950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.76
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency17.9921.98
Architecture codenameGenoa-X (2023)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)11 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,756$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 3950X have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 3950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores9616 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads19232
Base clock speed2.55 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache1152 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size12x 72 mm22 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm2
Number of transistors135,240 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 3950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP5AM4
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 3950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 3950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 3950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/A-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 3950X.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9684X 76.02
+212%
Ryzen 9 3950X 24.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9684X 120760
+212%
Ryzen 9 3950X 38744

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 76.02 24.39
Recency 13 June 2023 11 June 2019
Physical cores 96 16
Threads 192 32
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 9684X has a 211.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 9 3950X, on the other hand, has 281% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9684X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 3950X in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9684X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 3950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9684X and Ryzen 9 3950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9684X
EPYC 9684X
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 9684X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 713 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9684X or Ryzen 9 3950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.