Xeon Platinum 8480 vs EPYC 9654

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654 and Xeon Platinum 8480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.30no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency19.42no data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (1 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,805no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654 and Xeon Platinum 8480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores9656 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads192112
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache384 MB (shared)105 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size12x 72 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data79 °C
Number of transistors78,840 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654 and Xeon Platinum 8480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654 and Xeon Platinum 8480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9654 and Xeon Platinum 8480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654 and Xeon Platinum 8480 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654 and Xeon Platinum 8480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size6 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654 and Xeon Platinum 8480.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12880

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 96 56
Threads 192 112
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 350 Watt

EPYC 9654 has 71.4% more physical cores and 71.4% more threads.

Xeon Platinum 8480, on the other hand, has 2.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 9654 and Xeon Platinum 8480. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654 and Xeon Platinum 8480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654
Intel Xeon Platinum 8480
Xeon Platinum 8480

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 992 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654 or Xeon Platinum 8480, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.