Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs EPYC 9474F

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9474F
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 360 Watt
66.11
+273%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.74

EPYC 9474F outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS by a whopping 273% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9474F and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.58no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency17.3747.94
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,780no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9474F and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads9616
Base clock speed3.6 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz5.2 GHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm4 nm
Die size8x 72 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9474F and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9474F and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9474F and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9474F and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800no data
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9474F and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9474F 66.11
+273%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 17.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9474F 105010
+273%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28175

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 66.11 17.74
Recency 10 November 2022 13 June 2023
Physical cores 48 8
Threads 96 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 9474F has a 272.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 928.6% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9474F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9474F is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9474F and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9474F
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 9474F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 47 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9474F or Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.