E1 Micro-6200T vs EPYC 9455P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9455P outperforms E1 Micro-6200T by a whopping 19420% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 24 | 3449 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.62 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD E-Series |
| Power efficiency | 9.43 | 3.62 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024) | Mullins (2014) |
| Release date | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 29 April 2014 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,819 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 9455P and E1 Micro-6200T: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 96 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.15 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 8x 70.6 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 66,520 million | 930 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9455P and E1 Micro-6200T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | FT3b |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9455P and E1 Micro-6200T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | FMA4 |
| AVX | + | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9455P and E1 Micro-6200T are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9455P and E1 Micro-6200T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 9455P and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by EPYC 9455P and E1 Micro-6200T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9455P and E1 Micro-6200T.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 68.32 | 0.35 |
| Recency | 10 October 2024 | 29 April 2014 |
| Physical cores | 48 | 2 |
| Threads | 96 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 4 Watt |
EPYC 9455P has a 19420% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
E1 Micro-6200T, on the other hand, has 7400% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 9455P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD E1 Micro-6200T in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 9455P is a server/workstation processor while E1 Micro-6200T is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
