A4 PRO-7350B vs EPYC 9455P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9455P
2024, $4,819
48 cores / 96 threads, 300 Watt
66.74
+7660%

EPYC 9455P outperforms A4 PRO-7350B by a whopping 7660% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking232831
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.73no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency9.390.56
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameTurin (2024)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date10 October 2024 (1 year ago)31 July 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,819no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9455P and A4 PRO-7350B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads962
Base clock speed3.15 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography4 nm28 nm
Die size8x 70.6 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors66,520 million2,411 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9455P and A4 PRO-7350B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP5FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9455P and A4 PRO-7350B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9455P and A4 PRO-7350B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9455P and A4 PRO-7350B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-1866
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data192
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 9455P and A4 PRO-7350B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 9455P and A4 PRO-7350B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9455P and A4 PRO-7350B.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 9455P 66.74
+7660%
A4 PRO-7350B 0.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 9455P 116914
+7632%
Samples: 99
A4 PRO-7350B 1512
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 66.74 0.86
Recency 10 October 2024 31 July 2014
Physical cores 48 2
Threads 96 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 9455P has a 7660.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

A4 PRO-7350B, on the other hand, has 361.5% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 9455P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A4 PRO-7350B in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9455P is a server/workstation processor while A4 PRO-7350B is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9455P
EPYC 9455P
AMD A4 PRO-7350B
A4 PRO-7350B

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9455P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 12 votes

Rate A4 PRO-7350B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9455P and A4 PRO-7350B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.