AMD-K5-PR166ABQ vs EPYC 9374F
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 55 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.11 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD K5 |
| Power efficiency | 6.16 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Genoa (2022−2023) | K5 (1996−1997) |
| Release date | 10 November 2022 (2 years ago) | 6 January 1997 (28 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,850 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9374F and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.85 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 0.07 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 66.66 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 38.5 | 1.75 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | 350 nm |
| Die size | 8x 72 mm2 | 181 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 52,560 million | 4 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9374F and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | SP5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9374F and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9374F and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9374F and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 6 TiB | 4 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9374F and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 November 2022 | 6 January 1997 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 1 |
| Threads | 64 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 350 nm |
EPYC 9374F has an age advantage of 25 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 6900% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9374F and AMD AMD-K5-PR166ABQ. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 9374F is a server/workstation processor while AMD-K5-PR166ABQ is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
