AMD-K5-PR166ABQ vs EPYC 9334

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking92not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.34no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD K5
Power efficiency7.42no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)K5 (1996−1997)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)6 January 1997 (28 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,990no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9334 and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads641
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data66.66 MT/s
Multiplier271.75
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache128 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm350 nm
Die size4x 72 mm2181 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million4 Million
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9334 and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)210 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9334 and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9334 and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9334 and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800no data
Maximum memory size6 TiB4 GB
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9334 and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2022 6 January 1997
Physical cores 32 1
Threads 64 1
Chip lithography 5 nm 350 nm

EPYC 9334 has an age advantage of 25 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 6900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9334 and AMD AMD-K5-PR166ABQ. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9334 is a server/workstation processor while AMD-K5-PR166ABQ is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9334
EPYC 9334
AMD AMD-K5-PR166ABQ
AMD-K5-PR166ABQ

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9334 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate AMD-K5-PR166ABQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9334 and AMD-K5-PR166ABQ, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.