Xeon Silver 4510 vs EPYC 9224

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9224
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
28.23
+32.3%
Xeon Silver 4510
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
21.34

EPYC 9224 outperforms Xeon Silver 4510 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9224 and Xeon Silver 4510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking174267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.96100.00
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency13.4113.51
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,825$563

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4510 has 616% better value for money than EPYC 9224.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9224 and Xeon Silver 4510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size4x 72 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors26,280 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9224 and Xeon Silver 4510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9224 and Xeon Silver 4510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 9224 and Xeon Silver 4510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9224 and Xeon Silver 4510 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9224 and Xeon Silver 4510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC)
Maximum memory size6 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9224 and Xeon Silver 4510.

PCIe version5.05
PCI Express lanes12880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 9224 28.23
+32.3%
Xeon Silver 4510 21.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9224 45223
+32.3%
Xeon Silver 4510 34192

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.23 21.34
Recency 10 November 2022 14 December 2023
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 150 Watt

EPYC 9224 has a 32.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4510, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9224 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4510 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9224
EPYC 9224
Intel Xeon Silver 4510
Xeon Silver 4510

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9224 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9224 and Xeon Silver 4510, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.