Xeon 6507P vs EPYC 9174F
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9174F outperforms Xeon 6507P by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 179 | 409 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 7.31 | 20.70 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.00 | 5.02 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Genoa (2022−2023) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 10 November 2022 (3 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,850 | $765 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon 6507P has 183% better value for money than EPYC 9174F.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 9174F and Xeon 6507P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 41 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 48 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm, 6 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Die size | 8x 72 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 77 °C |
| Number of transistors | 52,560 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 9174F and Xeon 6507P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | SP5 | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9174F and Xeon 6507P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
EPYC 9174F and Xeon 6507P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9174F and Xeon 6507P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9174F and Xeon 6507P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR5(6400MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | 6 TiB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9174F and Xeon 6507P.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 88 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 30.24 | 17.80 |
| Recency | 10 November 2022 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 320 Watt | 150 Watt |
EPYC 9174F has a 69.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Xeon 6507P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 113.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 9174F is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon 6507P in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
