Ryzen 7 7700 vs EPYC 9224

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9224
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
26.72
+22.5%
Ryzen 7 7700
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
21.81

EPYC 9224 outperforms Ryzen 7 7700 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9224 and Ryzen 7 7700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking180238
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.6551.47
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency12.6431.75
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,825$339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 7700 has 307% better value for money than EPYC 9224.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9224 and Ryzen 7 7700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1536 KB512 KB
L2 cache24 MB8 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size4x 72 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors26,280 million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9224 and Ryzen 7 7700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt65W, (85W real world)

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9224 and Ryzen 7 7700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9224 and Ryzen 7 7700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9224 and Ryzen 7 7700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size6 TiB128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9224 and Ryzen 7 7700.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9224 26.72
+22.5%
Ryzen 7 7700 21.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9224 42448
+22.5%
Ryzen 7 7700 34639

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.72 21.81
Recency 10 November 2022 4 January 2023
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 9224 has a 22.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen 7 7700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 207.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9224 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7700 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9224 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9224 and Ryzen 7 7700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9224
EPYC 9224
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
Ryzen 7 7700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9224 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1451 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9224 or Ryzen 7 7700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.