EPYC 4464P vs EPYC 9224

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9224
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
26.72
EPYC 4464P
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
30.54
+14.3%

EPYC 4464P outperforms EPYC 9224 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9224 and EPYC 4464P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking185135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.6669.97
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency12.6427.51
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,825$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4464P has 453% better value for money than EPYC 9224.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9224 and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.4 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm
Die size4x 72 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors26,280 million13,140 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9224 and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9224 and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9224 and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9224 and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9224 and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9224 26.72
EPYC 4464P 30.54
+14.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9224 42448
EPYC 4464P 48518
+14.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.72 30.54
Recency 10 November 2022 21 May 2024
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 105 Watt

EPYC 9224 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

EPYC 4464P, on the other hand, has a 14.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 90.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9224 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9224 and EPYC 4464P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9224
EPYC 9224
AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9224 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9224 or EPYC 4464P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.