EPYC 7351P vs EPYC 8324P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8324P
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
35.96
+123%
EPYC 7351P
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
16.15

EPYC 8324P outperforms EPYC 7351P by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 8324P and EPYC 7351P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking101414
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.505.68
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency18.818.94
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,895$750

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8324P has 208% better value for money than EPYC 7351P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8324P and EPYC 7351P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed2.65 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die size4x 73 mm2192 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors35,500 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8324P and EPYC 7351P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP6TR4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8324P and EPYC 7351P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8324P and EPYC 7351P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8324P and EPYC 7351P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8324P and EPYC 7351P.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes96128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 8324P 35.96
+123%
EPYC 7351P 16.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 8324P 57127
+123%
EPYC 7351P 25657

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.96 16.15
Recency 18 September 2023 29 June 2017
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 32
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 170 Watt

EPYC 8324P has a 122.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

EPYC 7351P, on the other hand, has 5.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 8324P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7351P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 8324P and EPYC 7351P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8324P
EPYC 8324P
AMD EPYC 7351P
EPYC 7351P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8324P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 14 votes

Rate EPYC 7351P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 8324P or EPYC 7351P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.