AMD EPYC 8324P: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 8324P provides good benchmark performance at 36.52% of a leader's which is a 96-core Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
Summary
AMD started EPYC 8324P sales 18 September 2023. This is a Siena architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at professional systems. It has 32 cores and 64 threads, and is based on 5 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3000 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket SP6 processor with a TDP of 180 Watt and a maximum temperature of 75 °C. It supports DDR5 memory.
Primary details
EPYC 8324P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
Place in performance ranking | 95 | |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
Market segment | Server | |
Architecture codename | Siena (2023) | |
Release date | 18 September 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | |
Threads | 64 | |
Base clock speed | 2.65 GHz | of 4.7 GHz (FX-9590) |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | of 50 MHz (i486DX-50) |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | of 7475.2 KB (Apple M2 Pro 10-Core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | of 98304 KB (EPYC 9654) |
L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | of 1179648 KB (EPYC 9684X) |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | of 0.18 µm (K6-2+/450ACZ) |
Die size | 4x 73 mm2 | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | of 105 °C (Core i7-5950HQ) |
Number of transistors | 35,500 million | of 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X) |
64 bit support | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8324P compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Opteron 842) |
Socket | SP6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | of 462 Watt (Xeon w9-3595X) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8324P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | |
AVX | + | |
Precision Boost 2 | + |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
AMD-V | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by EPYC 8324P's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of a GPU integrated into EPYC 8324P.
Integrated graphics card | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
PCIe version | 5.0 | |
PCI Express lanes | 96 | of 128 (EPYC 7551P) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of EPYC 8324P. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Send your test results of EPYC 8324P.
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.