i7-4950HQ vs EPYC 8324P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8324P
2023, $1,895
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
32.61
+774%
Core i7-4950HQ
2013, $657
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
3.73

EPYC 8324P outperforms Core i7-4950HQ by a whopping 774% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1591670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.830.32
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Power efficiency7.653.35
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCIntel
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Crystalwell (2013−2014)
Release date18 September 2023 (2 years ago)7 June 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,895$657

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8324P has 5784% better value for money than i7-4950HQ.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8324P and Core i7-4950HQ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed2.65 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm22 nm
Die size4x 73 mm2264 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °C100 °C
Number of transistors35,500 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8324P and Core i7-4950HQ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP6FCBGA1364
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt47 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i7-4950HQ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
FDIno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 8324P and Core i7-4950HQ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i7-4950HQ are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i7-4950HQ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 8324P and Core i7-4950HQ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
VGAno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i7-4950HQ integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3840x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno data2880x1800@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i7-4950HQ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12
OpenGLno data4.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i7-4950HQ.

PCIe version5.03
PCI Express lanes9616

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.61 3.73
Recency 18 September 2023 7 June 2013
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 5 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 47 Watt

EPYC 8324P has a 774.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

i7-4950HQ, on the other hand, has 283% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 8324P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i7-4950HQ in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 8324P is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-4950HQ is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8324P
EPYC 8324P
Intel Core i7-4950HQ
Core i7-4950HQ

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8324P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Core i7-4950HQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8324P and Core i7-4950HQ, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.