i7-2685QM vs EPYC 8324P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking159not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.83no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Power efficiency7.65no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date18 September 2023 (2 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$1,895no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8324P and Core i7-2685QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed2.65 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography5 nm32 nm
Die size4x 73 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors35,500 million1160 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8324P and Core i7-2685QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP6Socket G2
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i7-2685QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 8324P and Core i7-2685QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i7-2685QM are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i7-2685QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel HD Graphics 3000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i7-2685QM.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes96no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 8324P has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

i7-2685QM, on the other hand, has 414.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 8324P and Intel Core i7-2685QM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 8324P is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-2685QM is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8324P
EPYC 8324P
Intel Core i7-2685QM
Core i7-2685QM

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8324P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-2685QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 8324P and Core i7-2685QM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.