i5-3330 vs EPYC 8324P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 8324P outperforms Core i5-3330 by a whopping 1294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 163 | 2033 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 92 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 18.84 | 0.23 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 7.66 | 1.28 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) | 3 September 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,895 | $360 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 8324P has 8091% better value for money than i5-3330.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 8324P and Core i5-3330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.65 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 4x 73 mm2 | 133 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | 67 °C |
| Number of transistors | 35,500 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8324P and Core i5-3330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP6 | FCLGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 77 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i5-3330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| My WiFi | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 8324P and Core i5-3330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i5-3330 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i5-3330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.05 GHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 8324P and Core i5-3330 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i5-3330.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 32.63 | 2.34 |
| Recency | 18 September 2023 | 3 September 2012 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 4 |
| Threads | 64 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 77 Watt |
EPYC 8324P has a 1294.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.
i5-3330, on the other hand, has 133.8% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 8324P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i5-3330 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 8324P is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-3330 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
