i5-1034G1 vs EPYC 8324P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 8324P outperforms Core i5-1034G1 by a whopping 533% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 165 | 1417 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 18.83 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i5 |
| Power efficiency | 7.65 | 14.51 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Siena (2023−2024) | Ice Lake U (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) | 29 May 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,895 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 8324P and Core i5-1034G1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 64 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.65 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 4x 73 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 35,500 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 8324P and Core i5-1034G1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | SP6 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i5-1034G1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i5-1034G1 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i5-1034G1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (300 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8324P and Core i5-1034G1.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 96 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 32.64 | 5.16 |
| Recency | 18 September 2023 | 29 May 2019 |
| Physical cores | 32 | 4 |
| Threads | 64 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 8324P has a 533% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
i5-1034G1, on the other hand, has 1100% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 8324P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i5-1034G1 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 8324P is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-1034G1 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
