Ryzen 9 7950X vs EPYC 7H12

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.03
+10.6%
Ryzen 9 7950X
2022
16 cores / 32 threads
40.71

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 9 7950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3956
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money22.2955.60
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Raphael (Zen 4)
Release date18 September 2019 (4 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Current price$1970 $821

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7950X has 149% better value for money than EPYC 7H12.

Technical specs

EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 9 7950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads12832
Base clock speed2.6 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm2CCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million13140 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 9 7950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 9 7950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 9 7950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 9 7950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-5200
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 9 7950X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 45.03
+10.6%
Ryzen 9 7950X 40.71

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7H12 69633
+10.6%
Ryzen 9 7950X 62940

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X by 11% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 45.03 40.71
Recency 18 September 2019 27 September 2022
Physical cores 64 16
Threads 128 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 170 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 7950X in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 9 7950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1297 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Ryzen 9 7950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.