Ultra 5 238V vs EPYC 7H12

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Core Ultra 5 238V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking46not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency14.82no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date18 September 2019 (5 years ago)24 September 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7H12 and Core Ultra 5 238V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1288
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.7 GHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache96K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Core Ultra 5 238V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core Ultra 5 238V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Core Ultra 5 238V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core Ultra 5 238V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core Ultra 5 238V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 130V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Core Ultra 5 238V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2019 24 September 2024
Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 17 Watt

EPYC 7H12 has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Ultra 5 238V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1547.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7H12 and Core Ultra 5 238V. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 238V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Core Ultra 5 238V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V
Core Ultra 5 238V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 5 238V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Core Ultra 5 238V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.