Ultra 5 238V vs EPYC 7702

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7702
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
44.06
+214%
Core Ultra 5 238V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
14.04

EPYC 7702 outperforms Core Ultra 5 238V by a whopping 214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7702 and Core Ultra 5 238V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking46525
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.07no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency20.8578.16
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,450no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7702 and Core Ultra 5 238V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1288
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702 and Core Ultra 5 238V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702 and Core Ultra 5 238V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7702 and Core Ultra 5 238V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702 and Core Ultra 5 238V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702 and Core Ultra 5 238V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 130V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7702 and Core Ultra 5 238V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.06 14.04
Recency 7 August 2019 24 September 2024
Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 17 Watt

EPYC 7702 has a 213.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Ultra 5 238V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1076.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7702 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 238V in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7702 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 238V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702 and Core Ultra 5 238V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702
EPYC 7702
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V
Core Ultra 5 238V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7702 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 11 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 238V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702 or Core Ultra 5 238V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.