Xeon Gold 6312U vs EPYC 7F52

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7F52
2020
16 cores / 32 threads
26.06
Xeon Gold 6312U
2021
24 cores / 48 threads
27.50
+5.5%

Xeon Gold 6312U outperforms EPYC 7F52 by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7F52 and Xeon Gold 6312U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking161150
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money4.55no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years old)6 April 2021 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,100no data
Current price$4919 (1.6x MSRP)no data

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

EPYC 7F52 and Xeon Gold 6312U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3248
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size74 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data80 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F52 and Xeon Gold 6312U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F52 and Xeon Gold 6312U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7F52 and Xeon Gold 6312U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F52 and Xeon Gold 6312U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F52 and Xeon Gold 6312U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F52 and Xeon Gold 6312U.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F52 26.06
Xeon Gold 6312U 27.50
+5.5%

Xeon Gold 6312U outperforms EPYC 7F52 by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7F52 39923
Xeon Gold 6312U 42124
+5.5%

Xeon Gold 6312U outperforms EPYC 7F52 by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 26.06 27.50
Recency 14 April 2020 6 April 2021
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 32 48
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 185 Watt

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7F52 and Xeon Gold 6312U. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F52 and Xeon Gold 6312U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F52
EPYC 7F52
Intel Xeon Gold 6312U
Xeon Gold 6312U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7F52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6312U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F52 or Xeon Gold 6312U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.