Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs EPYC 7F52

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F52
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.81
+42.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
18.12

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking170312
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.99no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Hawk Point
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,100no data
Current price$1706 (0.6x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm4 nm
Die size74 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors3,800 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FP7
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F52 25.81
+42.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 18.12

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS by 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7F52 39923
+42.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 28023

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS by 42% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.81 18.12
Recency 14 April 2020 16 April 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 28 Watt

The EPYC 7F52 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F52
EPYC 7F52
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7F52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F52 or Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.