Ryzen 3 5125C vs EPYC 7F52
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 272 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.97 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | 10.49 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 14 April 2020 (5 years ago) | 5 May 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,100 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 3 5125C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 35 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 74 mm2 | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 3,800 million | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 3 5125C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 3 5125C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 3 5125C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 3 5125C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F52 and Ryzen 3 5125C.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 April 2020 | 5 May 2022 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 15 Watt |
EPYC 7F52 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
Ryzen 3 5125C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 1500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7F52 and AMD Ryzen 3 5125C. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7F52 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 5125C is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
