Ryzen 5 7520U vs i5-L16G7

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-L16G7
2020
5 cores / 5 threads, 7 Watt
2.13
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.79
+172%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms Core i5-L16G7 by a whopping 172% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18561116
Place by popularitynot in top-10027
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Ice LakeMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency28.8036.53
Architecture codenameLakefield (2020)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release dateJune 2020 (4 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores5 (Penta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads58
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm6 nm
Die size82 mm2100 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors4,050 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFC-CSP1016FP6
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen 5 7520U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR4X-4267DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth34 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsAMD Radeon 610M
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units64no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDX12no data
OpenGLOpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-L16G7 2.13
Ryzen 5 7520U 5.79
+172%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-L16G7 3386
Ryzen 5 7520U 9198
+172%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-L16G7 602
Ryzen 5 7520U 1190
+97.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-L16G7 1191
Ryzen 5 7520U 3764
+216%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-L16G7 255
Ryzen 5 7520U 834
+227%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-L16G7 90
Ryzen 5 7520U 169
+88.6%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-L16G7 1634
Ryzen 5 7520U 3821
+134%

Blender(-)

i5-L16G7 2027
+245%
Ryzen 5 7520U 588

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-L16G7 827
Ryzen 5 7520U 1066
+29%

7-Zip Single

i5-L16G7 3211
Ryzen 5 7520U 4167
+29.8%

7-Zip

i5-L16G7 7587
Ryzen 5 7520U 24219
+219%

WebXPRT 3

i5-L16G7 125
Ryzen 5 7520U 191
+53.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.13 5.79
Integrated graphics card 5.58 2.85
Physical cores 5 4
Threads 5 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

i5-L16G7 has 95.8% faster integrated GPU, 25% more physical cores, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7520U, on the other hand, has a 171.8% higher aggregate performance score, 60% more threads, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 7520U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-L16G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-L16G7 and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-L16G7
Core i5-L16G7
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 23 votes

Rate Core i5-L16G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1412 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-L16G7 or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.