EPYC 9116 vs EPYC 7F52
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 320 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.56 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.13 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | Venice (2004−2026) |
| Release date | 14 April 2020 (6 years ago) | 23 July 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,100 | $1,200 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 9116: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.85 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 35 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 48 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 2 nm |
| Die size | 74 mm2 | 8x 76 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 3,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 9116 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | SP3 | SP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 160 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 9116. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 9116 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 9116. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F52 and EPYC 9116.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 6.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 April 2020 | 23 July 2026 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 2 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 240 Watt | 160 Watt |
EPYC 9116 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7F52 and AMD EPYC 9116. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
