EPYC 9476F vs EPYC 7F32
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 725 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.54 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.12 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2019−2020) | Venice (2004−2026) |
| Release date | 14 April 2020 (6 years ago) | 23 July 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,100 | $6,695 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 9476F: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.65 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 37 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (per die) | 192 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 2 nm |
| Die size | 4x 74 mm2 | 8x 76 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 15,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 9476F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | SP3 | SP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 330 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 9476F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 9476F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 9476F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 9476F.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 6.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 April 2020 | 23 July 2026 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 48 |
| Threads | 16 | 96 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 2 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 330 Watt |
EPYC 7F32 has 83% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9476F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 7F32 and AMD EPYC 9476F. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
