7 230H vs EPYC 7F52

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F52
2020, $3,100
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
23.94
+67.1%

EPYC 7F52 outperforms Core 7 230H by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking320673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.61no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Raptor Lake-H
Power efficiency4.13no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Raptor Lake-H (2023−2026)
Release date14 April 2020 (6 years ago)12 June 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,100no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC 7F52 and Core 7 230H: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.2 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96 KB (per core)864 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)9.5 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size74 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F52 and Core 7 230H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3BGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)240 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F52 and Core 7 230H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F52 and Core 7 230H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F52 and Core 7 230H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F52 and Core 7 230H.

PCIe version4.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC 7F52 23.94
+67.1%
7 230H 14.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 7F52 40985
+67.1%
Samples: 22
7 230H 24533
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.94 14.33
Recency 14 April 2020 12 June 2026
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm

EPYC 7F52 has a 67% higher aggregate performance score, 60% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

7 230H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years.

The AMD EPYC 7F52 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 7 230H in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7F52 is a server/workstation processor while Core 7 230H is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 12 votes

Rate EPYC 7F52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 7 230H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 7F52 and Core 7 230H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.