Ryzen 9 7950X vs EPYC 7F32

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7F32
2020
8 cores / 16 threads
15.16

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms EPYC 7F32 by 168% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 9 7950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking41556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.61
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Raphael (Zen 4)
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,100no data
Current priceno data$821

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 9 7950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.7 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm
Die size74 mm2CCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors3,800 million13140 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 9 7950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 9 7950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 9 7950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 9 7950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 9 7950X.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F32 15.16
Ryzen 9 7950X 40.68
+168%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms EPYC 7F32 by 168% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7F32 23453
Ryzen 9 7950X 62923
+168%

Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms EPYC 7F32 by 168% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.16 40.68
Recency 14 April 2020 27 September 2022
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 170 Watt

The Ryzen 9 7950X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7F32 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7F32 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 9 7950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1319 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F32 or Ryzen 9 7950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.