EPYC 73F3 vs EPYC 7F32

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F32
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
15.36
EPYC 73F3
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
30.19
+96.5%

EPYC 73F3 outperforms EPYC 7F32 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 73F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking467149
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.866.51
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.7711.45
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,100$3,521

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 73F3 has 69% better value for money than EPYC 7F32.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 73F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier3735
L1 cache96K (per core)1 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm+
Die size74 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors3,800 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 73F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 73F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 73F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 73F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 73F3.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F32 15.36
EPYC 73F3 30.19
+96.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7F32 23453
EPYC 73F3 46103
+96.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.36 30.19
Recency 14 April 2020 12 January 2021
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 240 Watt

EPYC 7F32 has 33.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 73F3, on the other hand, has a 96.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The EPYC 73F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7F32 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 73F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32
AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F32 or EPYC 73F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.