EPYC 7313P vs EPYC 7F32

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F32
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
15.36
EPYC 7313P
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
27.28
+77.6%

EPYC 7313P outperforms EPYC 7F32 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 7313P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking467178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.8722.40
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,100$913

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7313P has 479% better value for money than EPYC 7F32.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 7313P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier3730
L1 cache96K (per core)1 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm+
Die size74 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors3,800 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 7313P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3SP3
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 7313P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 7313P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 7313P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 7313P.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F32 15.36
EPYC 7313P 27.28
+77.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7F32 23453
EPYC 7313P 41657
+77.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.36 27.28
Recency 14 April 2020 12 January 2021
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 155 Watt

EPYC 7313P has a 77.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 16.1% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7313P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7F32 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F32 and EPYC 7313P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32
AMD EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7313P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7313P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F32 or EPYC 7313P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.