Turion 64 MT-32 vs EPYC 7C13
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7C13 outperforms Turion 64 MT-32 by a whopping 27125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 77 | 3581 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 8.17 | 0.27 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | no data |
| Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 2021 (5 years ago) | March 2005 (21 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7C13 and Turion 64 MT-32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.68 GHz | 1.79 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7C13 and Turion 64 MT-32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7C13 and Turion 64 MT-32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7C13 and Turion 64 MT-32 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7C13 and Turion 64 MT-32. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7C13 and Turion 64 MT-32.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 43.56 | 0.16 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 1 |
| Threads | 128 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 25 Watt |
EPYC 7C13 has a 27125% higher aggregate performance score, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 MT-32, on the other hand, has 800% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC 7C13 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 MT-32 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7C13 is a server/workstation processor while Turion 64 MT-32 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
