Xeon Platinum 8461V vs EPYC 7702

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7702
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.18
Xeon Platinum 8461V
2023
48 cores / 96 threads
48.48
+7.3%

Xeon Platinum 8461V outperforms EPYC 7702 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing EPYC 7702 and Xeon Platinum 8461V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3733
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation2.43no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Sapphire Rapids
Release date7 August 2019 (4 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,450no data
Current price$8948 (1.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

EPYC 7702 and Xeon Platinum 8461V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads12896
Base clock speed2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)97.5 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size192 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data77 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702 and Xeon Platinum 8461V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702 and Xeon Platinum 8461V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7702 and Xeon Platinum 8461V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702 and Xeon Platinum 8461V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702 and Xeon Platinum 8461V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7702 and Xeon Platinum 8461V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7702 45.18
Xeon Platinum 8461V 48.48
+7.3%

Xeon Platinum 8461V outperforms EPYC 7702 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7702 69872
Xeon Platinum 8461V 74982
+7.3%

Xeon Platinum 8461V outperforms EPYC 7702 by 7% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 45.18 48.48
Recency 7 August 2019 10 January 2023
Physical cores 64 48
Threads 128 96
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 300 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7702 and Xeon Platinum 8461V.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702 and Xeon Platinum 8461V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702
EPYC 7702
Intel Xeon Platinum 8461V
Xeon Platinum 8461V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7702 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8461V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702 or Xeon Platinum 8461V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.