Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs EPYC 7702

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7702
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
45.81
+331%
Xeon E5-2698B V3
2015
16 cores / 32 threads, 135 Watt
10.64

EPYC 7702 outperforms Xeon E5-2698B V3 by a whopping 331% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7702 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking44752
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.84no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency20.897.19
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,450no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7702 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads12832
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache32 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)40 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm22 nm
Die size192 mm2356 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data88 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR42011-3
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702 and Xeon E5-2698B V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7702 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702 and Xeon E5-2698B V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2133
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7702 and Xeon E5-2698B V3.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7702 45.81
+331%
Xeon E5-2698B V3 10.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7702 70107
+330%
Xeon E5-2698B V3 16287

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.81 10.64
Physical cores 64 16
Threads 128 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 135 Watt

EPYC 7702 has a 330.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2698B V3, on the other hand, has 48.1% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7702 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2698B V3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702 and Xeon E5-2698B V3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702
EPYC 7702
Intel Xeon E5-2698B V3
Xeon E5-2698B V3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7702 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2698B V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702 or Xeon E5-2698B V3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.