Ryzen 7 8700F vs EPYC 7662

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
45.51
+134%
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
19.48

EPYC 7662 outperforms Ryzen 7 8700F by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking43293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.55
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency19.0428.21
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$270

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads12816
Base clock speed2 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache4 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache32 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket SP3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7662 45.51
+134%
Ryzen 7 8700F 19.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7662 72298
+134%
Ryzen 7 8700F 30949

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.51 19.48
Recency 19 February 2020 1 April 2024
Physical cores 64 8
Threads 128 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7662 has a 133.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ryzen 7 8700F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 246.2% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 8700F in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 8700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 245 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or Ryzen 7 8700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.