Ryzen 5 240 vs EPYC 7662
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 5 240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 46 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
| Power efficiency | 19.14 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 19 February 2020 (4 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 5 240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 128 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Multiplier | 20 | no data |
| L1 cache | 4 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 32 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 5 240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | Socket SP3 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 5 240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 5 240 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 5 240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.763 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 5 240.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 February 2020 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 64 | 6 |
| Threads | 128 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
EPYC 7662 has 966.7% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads.
Ryzen 5 240, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 5 240. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 240 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 5 240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
