Core i7-14700F vs EPYC 7662

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
46.97
+62.4%

EPYC 7662 outperforms i7-14700F by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7662 and Core i7-14700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking35145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Raptor Lake-R
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)no data
Current priceno data$387

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7662 and Core i7-14700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads12828
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache4 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache32 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB33 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and Core i7-14700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket SP3FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Core i7-14700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7662 and Core i7-14700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Core i7-14700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Core i7-14700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB192 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and Core i7-14700F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7662 46.97
+62.4%
i7-14700F 28.93

EPYC 7662 outperforms Core i7-14700F by 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7662 72653
+62.4%
i7-14700F 44740

EPYC 7662 outperforms Core i7-14700F by 62% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.97 28.93
Physical cores 64 20
Threads 128 28
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-14700F in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-14700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and Core i7-14700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
Intel Core i7-14700F
Core i7-14700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 118 votes

Rate Core i7-14700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or Core i7-14700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.