EPYC 75F3 vs EPYC 7642

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7642
2019
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
38.06
EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
44.76
+17.6%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms EPYC 7642 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7642 and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9050
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.406.18
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency15.4214.58
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,775$4,860

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 75F3 has 14% better value for money than EPYC 7642.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7642 and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads9664
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier2329.5
L1 cache3 MB2 MB
L2 cache24 MB16 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm+
Die size192 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7642 and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7642 and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7642 and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7642 and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7642 and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7642 38.06
EPYC 75F3 44.76
+17.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7642 58248
EPYC 75F3 68505
+17.6%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7642 1274
EPYC 75F3 1826
+43.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7642 10479
EPYC 75F3 16432
+56.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.06 44.76
Recency 7 August 2019 12 January 2021
Physical cores 48 32
Threads 96 64
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 7642 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 24.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 75F3, on the other hand, has a 17.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7642 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7642 and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7642
EPYC 7642
AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7642 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7642 or EPYC 75F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.