EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 7573X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7573X
2022
32 cores / 64 threads
44.89

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7573X by an impressive 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7573X and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.0510.11
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameMilan-X (2022)Genoa
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current price$4598 $4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9654 has 26% better value for money than EPYC 7573X.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7573X and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)96
Threads64192
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache768 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size8x 81 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 million78,840 million
64 bit support-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7573X and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7573X and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7573X and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7573X and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7573X and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7573X 44.89
EPYC 9654 78.98
+75.9%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7573X by 76% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7573X 69432
EPYC 9654 122155
+75.9%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7573X by 76% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.89 78.98
Recency 22 March 2022 10 November 2022
Physical cores 32 96
Threads 64 192
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7573X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7573X and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7573X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 982 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7573X or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.