EPYC 9654 vs EPYC 7552

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7552
2019
48 cores / 96 threads, 200 Watt
38.58
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.70
+96.2%

EPYC 9654 outperforms EPYC 7552 by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7552 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking756
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.381.36
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency18.2619.90
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,025$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7552 has 443% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7552 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)96
Threads96192
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier2224
L1 cache96 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache192 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size192 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors3,800 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7552 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSP3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7552 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7552 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7552 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7552 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7552 38.58
EPYC 9654 75.70
+96.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7552 61282
EPYC 9654 120246
+96.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.58 75.70
Recency 7 August 2019 10 November 2022
Physical cores 48 96
Threads 96 192
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 360 Watt

EPYC 7552 has 80% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 96.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7552 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7552 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7552
EPYC 7552
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 42 votes

Rate EPYC 7552 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 995 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7552 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.