EPYC 7352 vs EPYC 7551

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7551
2017
32 cores / 64 threads
14.52
EPYC 7352
2019
24 cores / 48 threads
25.93
+78.6%

EPYC 7352 outperforms EPYC 7551 by 79% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing EPYC 7551 and EPYC 7352 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking449163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation19.6223.86
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date29 June 2017 (6 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400$1,350
Current price$252 (0.1x MSRP)$819 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7352 has 22% better value for money than EPYC 7551.

Detailed Specifications

EPYC 7551 and EPYC 7352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads6448
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7551 and EPYC 7352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7551 and EPYC 7352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7551 and EPYC 7352 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7551 and EPYC 7352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7551 and EPYC 7352.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7551 14.52
EPYC 7352 25.93
+78.6%

EPYC 7352 outperforms EPYC 7551 by 79% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7551 22463
EPYC 7352 40096
+78.5%

EPYC 7352 outperforms EPYC 7551 by 78% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 14.52 25.93
Recency 29 June 2017 7 August 2019
Physical cores 32 24
Threads 64 48
Cost $3400 $1350
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 155 Watt

The EPYC 7352 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7551 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7551 and EPYC 7352, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7551
EPYC 7551
AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7551 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7551 or EPYC 7352, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.