Xeon Platinum 8352M vs EPYC 7532

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
34.30
+19.5%
Xeon Platinum 8352M
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 185 Watt
28.71

EPYC 7532 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8352M by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking98148
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.482.14
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$800 $9928

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7532 has 1698% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8352M.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache2 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketSocket SP3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352M.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7532 34.30
+19.5%
Xeon Platinum 8352M 28.71

EPYC 7532 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8352M by 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7532 53051
+19.5%
Xeon Platinum 8352M 44406

EPYC 7532 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8352M by 19% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.30 28.71
Recency 19 February 2020 6 April 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 185 Watt

The EPYC 7532 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8352M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7532
EPYC 7532
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352M
Xeon Platinum 8352M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 18 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7532 or Xeon Platinum 8352M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.