E-350 vs EPYC 7501

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7501 and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking384not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.27no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date29 June 2017 (6 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,400no data
Current price$1320 (0.4x MSRP)$268

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7501 and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads642
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm40 nm
Die size192 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7501 and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FT1
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7501 and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7501 and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7501 and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6310

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7501 and E-350.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7501 24925
+5820%
E-350 421

EPYC 7501 outperforms E-350 by 5820% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7501 726
+598%
E-350 104

EPYC 7501 outperforms E-350 by 598% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

EPYC 7501 6529
+3507%
E-350 181

EPYC 7501 outperforms E-350 by 3507% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 4 January 2011
Physical cores 32 2
Threads 64 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 18 Watt

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7501 and E-350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7501 is a server/workstation processor while E-350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7501 and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7501
EPYC 7501
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7501 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 364 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7501 or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.