Intel Xeon W-3375 vs AMD EPYC 74F3

Price now 3100$
Games supported 100%
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Intel Xeon W-3375
Intel Xeon W-3375
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now no data
Games supported 100%

General info

Comparing EPYC 74F3 and Xeon W-3375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rating3047
Value for money10.56no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date12 January 2021
(2 years old)
29 July 2021
(1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,900no data
Current price$3100 (1.1x MSRP)no data
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
no data

Technical specs

EPYC 74F3 and Xeon W-3375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)38
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data80 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-


Information on EPYC 74F3 and Xeon W-3375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Thermal design power (TDP)240 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 74F3 and Xeon W-3375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

EPYC 74F3 and Xeon W-3375 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 74F3 and Xeon W-3375 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 74F3 and Xeon W-3375. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory supportno data+


Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 74F3 and Xeon W-3375.

PCIe version4.04
PCI Express lanesno data64

Benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 74F3 48.72
Xeon W-3375 42.92
  • Passmark


Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

EPYC 74F3 60472
Xeon W-3375 53266

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Xeon W-3375 by 14% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance rating 48.72 42.92
Recency 12 January 2021 29 July 2021
Base clock speed 2800 2500
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 240 Watt 270 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 74F3 and Xeon W-3375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User rating

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

5 2 ratings

Rate AMD EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 9 ratings

Rate Intel Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 74F3 or Xeon W-3375, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.