Xeon Platinum 8358 vs EPYC 74F3

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 74F3
2021
24 cores / 48 threads
39.23
+11.5%
Xeon Platinum 8358
2021
32 cores / 64 threads
35.19

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8358 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 74F3 and Xeon Platinum 8358 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money5.266.87
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameMilan (2021)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,900no data
Current price$5571 (1.9x MSRP)$6415

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8358 has 31% better value for money than EPYC 74F3.

Technical specs

EPYC 74F3 and Xeon Platinum 8358 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads4864
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+10 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 74F3 and Xeon Platinum 8358 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 74F3 and Xeon Platinum 8358. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 74F3 and Xeon Platinum 8358 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 74F3 and Xeon Platinum 8358 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 74F3 and Xeon Platinum 8358. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 74F3 and Xeon Platinum 8358.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes12864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 74F3 39.23
+11.5%
Xeon Platinum 8358 35.19

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8358 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 74F3 60666
+11.5%
Xeon Platinum 8358 54416

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8358 by 11% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 39.23 35.19
Physical cores 24 32
Threads 48 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 250 Watt

The EPYC 74F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8358 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 74F3 and Xeon Platinum 8358, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358
Xeon Platinum 8358

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8358 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 74F3 or Xeon Platinum 8358, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.