Xeon D-1521 vs i3-10105F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10105F
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.65
+57.8%
Xeon D-1521
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
3.58

Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon D-1521 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and Xeon D-1521 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11471519
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.60
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon D
Power efficiency8.237.53
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)1 November 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and Xeon D-1521 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)1.5 MB (per core)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C80 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and Xeon D-1521 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1200FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon D-1521. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and Xeon D-1521 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon D-1521 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon D-1521. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon D-1521.

PCIe version3.02.0/3.0
PCI Express lanes1624
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data+
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10105F 5.65
+57.8%
Xeon D-1521 3.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10105F 8971
+57.7%
Xeon D-1521 5690

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.65 3.58
Recency 16 March 2021 1 November 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

i3-10105F has a 57.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 years.

Xeon D-1521, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-10105F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1521 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-10105F is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1521 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Xeon D-1521, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
Intel Xeon D-1521
Xeon D-1521

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3661 vote

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon D-1521 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or Xeon D-1521, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.