Xeon Silver 4216 vs EPYC 7451

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.90
+25.5%
Xeon Silver 4216
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 100 Watt
13.47

EPYC 7451 outperforms Xeon Silver 4216 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7451 and Xeon Silver 4216 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking403576
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.7817.62
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency8.5612.28
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,400$1,002

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4216 has 890% better value for money than EPYC 7451.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7451 and Xeon Silver 4216 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier2321
L1 cache2.25 MB1 MB
L2 cache12 MB16 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data79 °C
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7451 and Xeon Silver 4216 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon Silver 4216. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7451 and Xeon Silver 4216 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon Silver 4216 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon Silver 4216. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiB1 TB
Max memory channels86
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and Xeon Silver 4216.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7451 16.90
+25.5%
Xeon Silver 4216 13.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7451 25863
+25.5%
Xeon Silver 4216 20613

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.90 13.47
Recency 20 June 2017 2 April 2019
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 100 Watt

EPYC 7451 has a 25.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4216, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 80% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7451 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4216 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7451 and Xeon Silver 4216, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451
Intel Xeon Silver 4216
Xeon Silver 4216

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7451 or Xeon Silver 4216, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.