Ryzen 7 8840U vs EPYC 7451

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7451
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
16.72
+6.2%

EPYC 7451 outperforms Ryzen 7 8840U by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 7 8840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking358407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.08no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,400no data
Current price$2768 (1.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 7 8840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache2.25 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size213 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors19200 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 7 8840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FP8
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 7 8840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 7 8840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 7 8840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 7 8840U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7451 16.72
+6.2%
Ryzen 7 8840U 15.75

EPYC 7451 outperforms Ryzen 7 8840U by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7451 25863
+6.2%
Ryzen 7 8840U 24364

EPYC 7451 outperforms Ryzen 7 8840U by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.72 15.75
Recency 20 June 2017 6 December 2023
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 28 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 7 8840U.

Be aware that EPYC 7451 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 8840U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7451 and Ryzen 7 8840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7451
EPYC 7451
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
Ryzen 7 8840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7451 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 36 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7451 or Ryzen 7 8840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.